On page 143 Bachelder writes a story of Sinclair eating with
a “black guy, a Jew, a Mexican, a redneck, and an Eskimo” at a bar. At the end
of this story that portrays ethnic/religious stereotypes, Sinclair is shot one
more time. Bachelder uses this—as I would call it—anti-joke satirical element
in order to convey an important message. I think that the reason why Bechelder
uses this racist story is due to the many criticisms that Sinclaire got on two
of his works: Oil! and The Jungle. Oil! was critiqued to be an anti-Jew while The Jungle was thought to be anti-black. Even though I’m not sure
about the reason behind Bechelder’s use of this story, I am guessing he just
wants to point at Sinclair’s stand on racism as negligible compared to the
significance of his contributions to the socialistic ideology. Therefore, I
think Bachelder makes something that is not as important—at least in his
opinion—into satire in order to then direct the attention of audience to the
more important content. I can use this element in order to be in control of my
audience’s attention—which as Passionate
Politics says is limited—when I make my educational video to be able to
skim over unimportant arguments and get to the core in a short amount of
time.
On page 170, Bachelder writes about Sinclair’s excessive
usage of exclamation points by dedicating an entire page to just exclamation
points! I feel like the reason why Sinclair and Bechelder use exclamation
points so excessively is to convey a sense of urgency. Conveying a sense of
urgency for change is one of the characteristics of melodrama and I can use
that for example in my manifesto in order to grab the attention of my audience
and show them why it is important to support Iranian refugees who seek refuge
in the United States.
Another satirical element can be seen in the chapter that
starts on page 67. I feel like Bachelder sets the scene perfectly for a great
satire at the end of the story which also very astutely portrays Sinclair’s
idea about America’s reward system which puts people against each other. I feel
like had Bechelder not set the scene so perfectly, this joke would not have
worked anywhere close to the way it did in this story. Setting the scene for
sarcasm is very noticeable in Bachelder’s book and is something that I will
definitely be using in my educational video since I want it to be funny but at
the same time informative about a topic that is inherently serious and dramatic.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are restricted to course members only.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.